Note:
This review appeared last week, in a somewhat different form, in the
TLS. It had been shortened from the original edited version, where it
had been improved greatly by some reordering and a change of focus,
which I appreciated greatly, because this is a deeply-layered book
that provokes often conflicting reactions. The printed piece is
locked behind the TLS paywall; I recommend the new-look paper if you
are interested. But I thought I would offer you the chance to chance
my original version, improved by sensitive editing, which I think get
further into and closer to the heart of a moving book.
Thomas
H. Cook is one of the finest crime writers in the world. His
protagonists tend to be observers; his books are often set in the
world of their memory, dealing with the dead and the past. Stories
tend to become clearer gradually, like a photograph developing, and
his style, while displaying gothic overtones, is measured and
straightforward. “My characters are fighting inevitability”, he
told me once in an interview. “The sense that life is not designed
to live up to our imaginations. Instead it’s incredibly cruel.”
There
is an autobiographical touch; in
two of his novels, characters are writers who have specialized in
travel to dark places. One of them is a man who has lost his son,
kidnapped as he waited in the rain for his father to pick him up from
school; the father, caught up in his writing, had forgotten the time.
Tragic
Shores
begins with a prologue, Cook's
visit
to
Alcazar, where in 1936 the commander of the fortress refused to
surrender to Republican forces, then listened over a telephone as the
commander of those forces murdered his son. Later in the
book,
Cook tells the story of waiting in the rain for his mother to collect
him after school. He refuses the offer of a lift from the mother of a
classmate. 'Get in, Tommy, I won't hurt you,' the woman says. 'That's
what they all say,' the young Cook replies.
On the surface, this is a journal of “dark travel”, to places where human cruelty and tragedy have left their marks, where they remain a living presence and have not, as Cook puts it, “retreated into history”. It proceeds from Lourdes to Auschwitz; from the leper colony at Kalaupapa to Hiroshima; from Cambodia’s Year Zero to New York’s Ground Zero; from New Echota, capital of the Cherokee nation before the Trail of Tears, to the site of massacres in Ghana; from Machecoul in Northern France, where Gilles de Rais, the West’s first recorded serial killer, preyed on local youths in the fifteenth century, to the cliffs of Okinawa from which Japanese parents threw their children, then followed them to their deaths, rather than face the atrocities they believed the Americans would visit upon them. At Verdun, being told “no one comes here anymore”, Cook ponders the “well of forgetfulness” into which so many lost lives have sunk, and attempts to pull those memories back into the light.
On the surface, this is a journal of “dark travel”, to places where human cruelty and tragedy have left their marks, where they remain a living presence and have not, as Cook puts it, “retreated into history”. It proceeds from Lourdes to Auschwitz; from the leper colony at Kalaupapa to Hiroshima; from Cambodia’s Year Zero to New York’s Ground Zero; from New Echota, capital of the Cherokee nation before the Trail of Tears, to the site of massacres in Ghana; from Machecoul in Northern France, where Gilles de Rais, the West’s first recorded serial killer, preyed on local youths in the fifteenth century, to the cliffs of Okinawa from which Japanese parents threw their children, then followed them to their deaths, rather than face the atrocities they believed the Americans would visit upon them. At Verdun, being told “no one comes here anymore”, Cook ponders the “well of forgetfulness” into which so many lost lives have sunk, and attempts to pull those memories back into the light.
It
is not schadenfreude; he does not seek comfort from the fact that the
tragedies visited on others have somehow passed him by. Yet, this
might seem an unattractive basis for a travel book. Indeed, much of
the description can seem mundane in the face of such overwhelming
emotion. Cook, his wife Susan and their daughter Justine try bravely
to become travellers absorbing new places, rather than tourists
carrying their own worlds with them. But many of these sites rest
uneasily with the tourist trade; watching the mothers of Cinco de
Mayo in Buenos Aires disperse after their weekly demonstration for
their “disappeared” relatives is not the only scene that provokes
a sense of disconnection.. But the more everyday the picture, the
more intensely the reader perceives Cook’s real intent, which is
easy to miss even though he states it clearly in the first line of
his prologue: “I have come to thank dark places for the light they
bring to life”.
After
touring a small hall dedicated to the Apprentice Boys of Derry
commemorating the siege of the city in 1688–9, and the origins of
the staunchly Unionist Protestant association, his guide offers a
hand, saying, “we’re not bad people”. When Cook takes the hand,
responding “most people aren’t bad”, it sounds like a wistful
warning, recalling his mother's long-ago advice. This is the central
dilemma with which Cook wrestles, the reason why he immerses himself
in the darkness, the question of why, if most people are not bad, so
much evil seems to define their lives.
Oddly
enough, in this worldwide compendium of human misery, a hint of an
answer comes from a tragedy visited on birds. It is perhaps the
saddest tale in the book, sad because of its seeming inevitability.
The extinction of the heath hen on Martha’s Vineyard followed, not
evil, but the requiste callousess of humans, when a century ago a
forest fire destroyed the preserve in which they had been protected
from human agency. Most of the female birds died protecting the nests
they would not abandon; the last male disappeared a few years later
in 1932. His disappearance speaks to a sense of selflessness with
which Cook, with a novelist’s sense of climax, intended to end his
book.
But
soon after his visit to Martha's Vineyard, his wife took ill. Susan
Terner died before this book was finished. Before she died, she
admonished Cook to remember the “value of knowing”, and though
the heath hens had brought the book to conclusion, he still needed to
explain what that knowledge meant.
The
Cooks had visited the tomb of Abelard and Héloïse in Père
Lachaise, the graves of Elvira Madigan and Sixten Sparre in Landet,
Denmark; two sets of lovers who ended their own lives when faced with
society's refusal to allow them their loves. But that sense of
despair finds contrast at the jumping point on the Golden Gate
Bridge, where thousands of suicides have taken their last steps, when
a passerby seems pleased and relieved to see him walking back from
the spot. In that man's relief, Cook senses “life’s ultimate
gimmick”, the “selfless, anonymous care” that persuades humans
to live. It is altruism, an engrained instinct to protect the wider
nest. That is the light which the dark places have revealed. Tragic
Shores
is not tragic at all. It is a love story, and a hymn to our ability
to go on, in the face of the ultimate darkness.
Tragic
Shores by Thomas H. Cook
Quercus, £20.00, ISBN 9781849163262
Quercus, £20.00, ISBN 9781849163262
No comments:
Post a Comment