When looking at The
Post, it's essential to keep the film's title in mind. Although
it opens with a bravura scene of a fire-fight in the Vietnam jungle,
a deathly chaos whose tracer lights illuminate Daniel Ellsberg's
experience, it is not a film about Vietnam. Neither, despite the
central presence of Robert McNamara as a catalyst for Ellsberg's
decision to take the government's lies public, is it a movie about
the Pentagon Papers. It is about the Washington Post, and its ascent
to a position of national prominence alongside (or just behind) the
New York Times. I've seen it said that the opening firefight serves
as a visual metaphor for the Post's battles with the government (and
the Times), but that idea, like the movie itself, does a huge
disservice to Ellsberg. That's because the real centre of The Post
is Katharine Graham's internal battle to assume control of her
father's and husband's paper, and the means through which she is able
to begin to enact her vision of being a major, quality daily. The
problem is that Graham's story runs along a parallel track with the
paper's search to beat the Times' exclusive, and Ben Bradlee's
competitive journalistic drive keeps the action moving.
To his credit,
Spielberg manages to bring the two strands together with some aplomb,
at the moment Graham gives the order to 'print'. Her struggle is the
more subtle, and repetitive, and it is difficult for Meryl Streep, as
Graham to convey the depth of her insecurities, though she does well
with what is presented. Graham's father, Eugene Meyer, had bought the
bankrupt Post in the 1930s. When he retired, he made Kataharine's
husband, Phil Graham, his successor. Graham was a manic depressive,
and we learn that he killed himself. But part of his problem was his
resentment of having been the son-in-law who rises, part that the
Post was still a backwater paper in a company town, and he was at
times abusive to Kay and the children: not least for her Jewishness.
This backstory is instructive, because none of it is given away,
instead Streep looks lovingly at Phil's photo. But if you're aware of
it you can see better the roots of the insecurities which Streep
delineates.
That she was taking
the Post public at the very moment the government exercised prior
restraint by getting an injunction against the Times' publication of
the Pentagon Papers is true, and it is rightly presented as a Rubicon
moment for her. She was risking her family's legacy, and the battle is
encapsulated well by Tracy Letts, in another of his good-guy roles as
Fritz Beebe, the family lawyer and chairman of the board. He's set against
Bradley Whitford, in a remarkable performance of unwillingly
restrained anger and resentment, as board-member Arthur Parsons.
Graham also had her
Washington social whirl, in which she was still playing the
traditional wifely role, to consider. And it is an underplayed
moment of decision when she sits down with McNamara (a brilliantly
accurate performance from Bruce Greenwood, getting just the sort of
moral incomprehension McNamara showed in The Fog of War) to
tell him she will be publishing the Papers. Ironically, in later life
Graham would seek injunctions similar to the government's against the Post, or take other actions against
her putative biographers.
In a sense, when it
comes to the newspaper side of the story, The Post is a cross
between The Fog Of War and All The President's Men on
the one hand, and on the other the classic newspaper drama, the kind
of modern version we saw in, say, Ron Howard's The Paper. In
fact, the most thrilling scenes in the movie, as in Howard's (a very Spielbergian director) are those that lovingly
follow the dynamic of setting linotype, and then the rush of the
presses as the papers roll off. The latter is something we've seen
repeatedly, but watching the drama of the pages themselves getting
set was literally inspiring.
All The
President's Men lurks in the background. It's amazing to realise
that the Post's first tranche of the Pentagon Papers literally fell
on the desk of a reporter (who tellingly remains anonymous and
excluded from the story itself) just as Deep Throat appeared in Bob
Woodward's ear (at least as the movie version would have you
believe). Bradlee's editorial ability to run with found gold is an
important one, but it was the other Ben, Ben Bagdikian (played with a
nice edge by Bob Odenkirk) who actually tracked down Ellsberg, whom
he'd known at Rand, and got the Post their scoop. Which of course
would not have been a scoop at all had not the Times been injuncted
against printing; but of course as the film shows, the Post's running
with their story opened the nation's floodgates.
Jason Robards'
Oscar-winning feet-on-the-desk performance as Bradlee hangs over Tom Hanks too, but
Spielberg and Hanks choose to play Bradlee not as Robards did, as a crotchety old-school journo, but as a sort of middle-class
suburban businessman, closer to William Holden in The Corporation.
The lemonade stand scenes remind us that Spielberg does like to frame
the world from a child's view, but Hanks' Bradlee shows none of the
society nous of his Boston Brahmin upbringing—Bradlee had come to
the Post by facilitating Phil Graham's purchase of Newsweek, and was
a mover in society almost as much as Graham. Kay Graham gets it
right when she questions Bradlee's actually closeness to JFK himself
(Bradlee's own book about it, Conversations With Kennedy, is an
effort to convince himself as much as the reader that it was more)
but Bradlee was also close to James Angleton of the CIA; his wife
Tony Pinchot was the sister of Mary Pinchot Meyer, married to Cord
Meyer (no relation to the Post's Meyer), another top-man at CIA; it isn't coincidental that Meyer was the brains behind the CIA's Operation Mockingbird, by which it acquired assets within the major media. When Mary (by then divorced from Cord) was murdered it was Bradlee
who helped Angleton find and destroy her diary, in which her own
relationship with Kennedy was supposedly detailed. But in this workd, even Bradlee's elite
Georgetown townhouse is made to look like something from a suburban
neighbourhood; Ben Bradlee is your good American Joe, pace Private
Ryan.
In the end it's the
Times that gets the media attention, with CL 'Punch' Sulzberger, like
Graham the heir to the paper, and AM 'Abe' Rosenthal, its managing
editor, facing the press when the Supreme Court decision in the
papers' favour is handed down. Michael Stuhlbarg's caricature of
Rosenthal (whose column, On My Mind, was universally derided as 'Out
Of My Mind' in the days when he stepped down from editorship) is
stereotypically amusing to the point of cruelty. When we hear Nixon's own voice on
the tapes, I was a little surprised there were no tirades against the
'Jews', Tricky Dick saw both the Times and Post as being Jewish
family affairs.
Spielberg ends the
film with an ironic reference to never going through this again, when
we all know that Watergate, which firmly put the Post on the dias
with the Times, was just around the corner. He does another
re-enactment of Frank Wills' discovery of the Watergate
burglars—remember those were the same burglars whose ransacking of
Ellsberg's psychiatrist's office got the government's prosecution of
the actual leaker thrown out of court. Spielberg likes to end his
films with none too subtle conclusions, think of the graveyard scenes
in Private Ryan or Schindler's List. The
fate of Daniel Ellsberg, of course, is only feed for another movie.
The Post gathered Oscar momentum because it has an obvious correlative to our present times, Donald Trump and Fake
News and the less stirring performance of our leading papers in their
age of declining relevance. This was illustrated in passing by
Spielberg in what was, ironically, the best moment in the entire film (apart from the linotype and presses). It is an
actual news clip of CBS television's Daniel Schorr explaining what
exactly the government was doing by taking the Times to court to stop
publication of the Pentagon Papers. Schorr does it in 30 seconds or
so. He covers the issues, explains the legal tactic, and sets the
stage for the movie better than it could do for itself. You can't imagine
any of our present-day knights of the makeup room on television doing that now.
No comments:
Post a Comment