You may have noticed a certain bit of radio silence from IT in the past two months. I have
been considering how to move forward in the New Year, and do more writing which can
help me earn a living, which IT patently does not, nor do many of the pieces which appear
elsewhere gratis on my part. I'm not sure I want to reduce this to being simply a notice
board for work published elsewhere; I'm also not convinced it's worth the effort of having
a review/essay site for its own sake; it reminds me too much of fanzine writing when I was
much much younger. I enjoy it, obviously, but I am perhaps unsuited to monetizing social
media.
I haven't reached any conclusions yet, but my idea is to transfer the archive of IT into a
website. My work on Medium(including the estimable Arc Digital site) and Patreon has not
attracted as much notice as I might have expected -- the difference between being involved and
committed perhaps.
In the meantime, I wish you all a very Happy New Year: what more can we hope for?
Tuesday, 31 December 2019
JOE BIDEN, JEREMY CORBYN & THE US ELECTION: MY ARC DIGITAL ESSAY
I did another piece for Arc Digital on Joe Biden's claim that being 'too far' left cost Labour
the election in the UK and would cost Democrats the election in the US. Is he right? Use this link
and you can read the article on Medium without enrolling....
https://arcdigital.media/american-corbyns-does-labours-electoral-catastrophe-disqualify-the-american-left-ecc7033ad70?source=friends_link&sk=05b48ee257a3c1b585e350a07c78f4f7
the election in the UK and would cost Democrats the election in the US. Is he right? Use this link
and you can read the article on Medium without enrolling....
https://arcdigital.media/american-corbyns-does-labours-electoral-catastrophe-disqualify-the-american-left-ecc7033ad70?source=friends_link&sk=05b48ee257a3c1b585e350a07c78f4f7
Thursday, 28 November 2019
THANKSGIVING AT IRON MIKE'S FOUNDRY
I wrote this for my weekly Patreon column, Friday Morning Tight End, as a freebie special, so I decided I should offer it here to those of you whom I have disappointed by not posting more in the past few months. The column picks all the games every week, I'm running at about 2/3 correct, and subscriptions are $3 a month. Try it at patreon.com/mikecarlsonfmte
Thanksgiving is my favourite holiday, just as fall may be my favourite season. In the US it is the biggest travel weekend of the year, and with the traditional turkey, like Christmas without the attendant trauma of gift-giving. In Britain, Christmas is the biggest travel time, even though it seems to torture most people (Scrooge is after all, British) and being British they took the day they dislike and extended it by another day, then closed all public transport and annually locate highway works where no one is working along most of the major roads. But Thanksgiving also beats Christmas because it's the greatest football holiday, and football permeates not only the day but the whole weekend.
Oddly enough, I never played in a Thanksgiving game. Most non-professional colleges don't have them, because their students (including the football team) head home, but nowadays, of course money talks, and this year it's also a late Thanksgiving, which means that although the Egg Bowl, between Mississippi and Mississippi State will be played on Thursday, the rest of the weekend will also feature such match-ups as The Clean Old-Fashioned Hate, between Georgia and Georgia Tech; Vanderbilt vs Tennessee; Clemson vs South Carolina (Palmetto Bowl); Ohio State vs Michigan; the Iron Bowl between Alabama and Auburn and two of the West Coast's biggies: Oregon vs Oregon State (The Civil War) and Washington vs Washington State (The Apple Bowl).
Of course the extending of the college season through conference playoffs has been a factor here too, not least because conferences realigned to add enough teams to justify a playoff. So the Texas-Texas A&M match which was once a staple of the November calendar is now gone because they play in different conferences.
Thanksgiving morning was usually the time for the great high school rivalries. My dad played for West Haven against New Haven's Hillhouse High in a game in 1943 that drew over 20,000 to the Yale Bowl; Hillhouse had the legendary Levi Jackson, one of the best players to by-pass the NFL, on their team. But I played as an academic scholarship boy at a prep school, whose team was mostly local post-grads doing a 'prep' year before college (our most famous was Yale's Albie Booth; now it's Shady McCoy) but whose student body was about half boarders, who like college students went home for the holiday.
West Haven wasn't playing Hillhouse any longer when I was a kid; New Haven's Commercial High had been rebranded Wilbur Cross and they now played Hillhouse, so West Haven had no natural rivalry, and my dad wasn't interested. He also didn't care about the traditional Milford-Stratford game: teams from towns on opposite sides of the Housatonic River. That one disappeared as both towns added a second school; when Milford added a third, Milford High itself disappeared. There is a more famous cross-river rivalry, however, the State Line Game between Easton (Pennsylvania) against Phillipsburg (New Jersey), towns on opposite sides of the Delaware River, and each a power within their own state.
So we would play touch football in the yard, or down by the right of way to the beach, at least until the year we were up at my uncle's in Chelmsford, Mass and our game attracted a group of neighbours. The game sort of broke up after my brother's complaint about my coverage degenerated into a fist-fight: Myles Garrett eat your heart out.
Connecticut, where I grew up, boasts the oldest high school rivalry: New London High against Norwich Free Academy, now called, somewhat tackily,Ye Olde Ball Game. It started in 1875, but hasn't been played continuously. The oldest one that has been played continuously is between Boston Latin and English High (which for some reason isn't called Boston English) which has been played every year since 1887. Most of the rest of the oldest rivalries are between the posh New England prep (ie private) schools, and probably featured people who went on to run America: Andover/Exeter; Milton/Noble & Greenough; Groton/St Mark's. You also get anomalies: in Connecticut Derby/Shelton and Ansonia/Naugatuck are both big games in the Housatonic Valley that draw Thanksgiving crowds, but the Ansonia/Derby game earlier in the season is actually bigger.
People think the Bears-Lions was the start of Thanksgiving pro football, but actually there were four games in 1920, a couple featuring NFL teams against non-league teams, including the Elyria (Ohio) Athletics, who played a scoreless draw with the NFL's Columbus Panhandles. The Bears (then called the Decatur Staleys) played the Chicago Tigers. Fixed rivalries came and went: the Packers and Lions was the big one when I was a kid, at least until Vince Lombardi refused to continue playing on Thanksgiving after a 13-13 draw in Detroit (in which Nick Pietrosante, who played his high school ball at Ansonia High scored the Lions' only TD. “Four days is not enough time to get ready for a game” Lombardi told commissioner Pete Rozelle.Pete didn't dare cross Vince. A few decades later, the NFL forces teams to play on Thursdays every week.
Three games is overkill, but this is America and we give thanks that more is always better and money (especially more money) always talks. But we really should allow some time for people to enjoy their dinner without the TV drawing them away—it used to do that even when there was only one, or two games (the AFL's made it two, then in 1966 the NFL moved against the AFL by adding the second, with the Cowboys as regular hosts) to distract you. The prime time game is fine, I guess. It's a shame the oddities of the NFL schedule make it hard to make Dallas-Houston, for example, or the Giants-Jets a permanent Thanksgiving Day game; you'd think their computers could deal with that. I'd love to see Chicago-Detroit be regular, and maybe Green Bay-Minnesota too (you could play the late one in whichever dome team was at home).
So enjoy your Thanksgiving dinner, even if you're here in Britain and it's not a holiday. I used to enjoy hosting the triple header at the Number One Sports Bar into the wee hours of the morning, just to be left with the real hardcore who were flipping a metaphorical bird, not a turkey, at their jobs. Whether you do celebrate or not, whether you watch the games or not, stop for a moment and just think about what you have to be thankful for. It's worth a special day to remind you.
Thanksgiving is my favourite holiday, just as fall may be my favourite season. In the US it is the biggest travel weekend of the year, and with the traditional turkey, like Christmas without the attendant trauma of gift-giving. In Britain, Christmas is the biggest travel time, even though it seems to torture most people (Scrooge is after all, British) and being British they took the day they dislike and extended it by another day, then closed all public transport and annually locate highway works where no one is working along most of the major roads. But Thanksgiving also beats Christmas because it's the greatest football holiday, and football permeates not only the day but the whole weekend.
Oddly enough, I never played in a Thanksgiving game. Most non-professional colleges don't have them, because their students (including the football team) head home, but nowadays, of course money talks, and this year it's also a late Thanksgiving, which means that although the Egg Bowl, between Mississippi and Mississippi State will be played on Thursday, the rest of the weekend will also feature such match-ups as The Clean Old-Fashioned Hate, between Georgia and Georgia Tech; Vanderbilt vs Tennessee; Clemson vs South Carolina (Palmetto Bowl); Ohio State vs Michigan; the Iron Bowl between Alabama and Auburn and two of the West Coast's biggies: Oregon vs Oregon State (The Civil War) and Washington vs Washington State (The Apple Bowl).
Of course the extending of the college season through conference playoffs has been a factor here too, not least because conferences realigned to add enough teams to justify a playoff. So the Texas-Texas A&M match which was once a staple of the November calendar is now gone because they play in different conferences.
Thanksgiving morning was usually the time for the great high school rivalries. My dad played for West Haven against New Haven's Hillhouse High in a game in 1943 that drew over 20,000 to the Yale Bowl; Hillhouse had the legendary Levi Jackson, one of the best players to by-pass the NFL, on their team. But I played as an academic scholarship boy at a prep school, whose team was mostly local post-grads doing a 'prep' year before college (our most famous was Yale's Albie Booth; now it's Shady McCoy) but whose student body was about half boarders, who like college students went home for the holiday.
West Haven wasn't playing Hillhouse any longer when I was a kid; New Haven's Commercial High had been rebranded Wilbur Cross and they now played Hillhouse, so West Haven had no natural rivalry, and my dad wasn't interested. He also didn't care about the traditional Milford-Stratford game: teams from towns on opposite sides of the Housatonic River. That one disappeared as both towns added a second school; when Milford added a third, Milford High itself disappeared. There is a more famous cross-river rivalry, however, the State Line Game between Easton (Pennsylvania) against Phillipsburg (New Jersey), towns on opposite sides of the Delaware River, and each a power within their own state.
So we would play touch football in the yard, or down by the right of way to the beach, at least until the year we were up at my uncle's in Chelmsford, Mass and our game attracted a group of neighbours. The game sort of broke up after my brother's complaint about my coverage degenerated into a fist-fight: Myles Garrett eat your heart out.
Connecticut, where I grew up, boasts the oldest high school rivalry: New London High against Norwich Free Academy, now called, somewhat tackily,Ye Olde Ball Game. It started in 1875, but hasn't been played continuously. The oldest one that has been played continuously is between Boston Latin and English High (which for some reason isn't called Boston English) which has been played every year since 1887. Most of the rest of the oldest rivalries are between the posh New England prep (ie private) schools, and probably featured people who went on to run America: Andover/Exeter; Milton/Noble & Greenough; Groton/St Mark's. You also get anomalies: in Connecticut Derby/Shelton and Ansonia/Naugatuck are both big games in the Housatonic Valley that draw Thanksgiving crowds, but the Ansonia/Derby game earlier in the season is actually bigger.
People think the Bears-Lions was the start of Thanksgiving pro football, but actually there were four games in 1920, a couple featuring NFL teams against non-league teams, including the Elyria (Ohio) Athletics, who played a scoreless draw with the NFL's Columbus Panhandles. The Bears (then called the Decatur Staleys) played the Chicago Tigers. Fixed rivalries came and went: the Packers and Lions was the big one when I was a kid, at least until Vince Lombardi refused to continue playing on Thanksgiving after a 13-13 draw in Detroit (in which Nick Pietrosante, who played his high school ball at Ansonia High scored the Lions' only TD. “Four days is not enough time to get ready for a game” Lombardi told commissioner Pete Rozelle.Pete didn't dare cross Vince. A few decades later, the NFL forces teams to play on Thursdays every week.
Three games is overkill, but this is America and we give thanks that more is always better and money (especially more money) always talks. But we really should allow some time for people to enjoy their dinner without the TV drawing them away—it used to do that even when there was only one, or two games (the AFL's made it two, then in 1966 the NFL moved against the AFL by adding the second, with the Cowboys as regular hosts) to distract you. The prime time game is fine, I guess. It's a shame the oddities of the NFL schedule make it hard to make Dallas-Houston, for example, or the Giants-Jets a permanent Thanksgiving Day game; you'd think their computers could deal with that. I'd love to see Chicago-Detroit be regular, and maybe Green Bay-Minnesota too (you could play the late one in whichever dome team was at home).
So enjoy your Thanksgiving dinner, even if you're here in Britain and it's not a holiday. I used to enjoy hosting the triple header at the Number One Sports Bar into the wee hours of the morning, just to be left with the real hardcore who were flipping a metaphorical bird, not a turkey, at their jobs. Whether you do celebrate or not, whether you watch the games or not, stop for a moment and just think about what you have to be thankful for. It's worth a special day to remind you.
Wednesday, 27 November 2019
BY THE GRACE OF GOD & SPOTLIGHT: Studies in abuse and faith
As you may have noticed I am not writing very much here at the moment, and in truth I am not writing
as much as I should be. But I did write an essay for Medium about two films concerned with child abuse and the Catholic Church, Francois Ozon's By The Grace Of God compared with Tom McCarthy's Spotlight. Both fine films, but for different reasons....here's the link.
as much as I should be. But I did write an essay for Medium about two films concerned with child abuse and the Catholic Church, Francois Ozon's By The Grace Of God compared with Tom McCarthy's Spotlight. Both fine films, but for different reasons....here's the link.
FAKE NEWS AND THE BRITAIN TRUMP: MY ARC DIGITAL ESSAY
I've written a piece for Arc Digital about the links between Boris Johnson's election campaign and its following the Donald Trump/Steve Bannon blueprint. It was originally going to be much longer and delve deeper into the 2016 referendum, but there just wasn't room. Check it out, this link ought to get you in without the paywall!
Friday, 18 October 2019
ELIJAH CUMMINGS: THE GUARDIAN OBITUARY
My obituary of Elijah Cummings, recent foil (and thus, inevitably, target) of Donald Trump as head of the House Oversight Committee, was online at the Guardian yesterday, and is in the paper paper today. You can link to the online version here. It is pretty much as I wrote it; a couple of literals snuck in, but they also edited it nicely to make clearer his children and relationships. There were a couple of other stories. One I left out because I didn't see it as relevant, which involved the murder of his nephew at college in Virginia. Another was the mini-scandal around his debts, including on taxes, at one point in his life. The source I was reading attributed it to ill-health, which I thought might have some relevance given his poor health in the last few years, but another source mentioned his child support payments, which led me to dig out his first wife and the parentage of his three kids. I left the debt out, but as I said, I thought the piece in the end explains his children well. One of his daughters was also in the news when it turned out she was using Cummings' congressional car while driving for Lyft, which isn't quite at Hunter Biden levels of scandal, but did get a lot of press.
Last summer I posed for a picture in my Baltimore Elite Giants shirt (they were a team in baseball's Negro Leagues, and the Elite was pronounced ee-lite) in support of Rep. Cummings when Trump was attacking him, and the city of Baltimore, in which I worked one summer and which I liked immensely, because, even though it was still more or less de facto segregated, it was a real city. Cummings strikes me as an old-fashioned machine kind of politician, although the machine has changed as it constituent parts have changed, and one who, when he had his opportunity on the bigger stages, didn't let that constituency down. RIP
Last summer I posed for a picture in my Baltimore Elite Giants shirt (they were a team in baseball's Negro Leagues, and the Elite was pronounced ee-lite) in support of Rep. Cummings when Trump was attacking him, and the city of Baltimore, in which I worked one summer and which I liked immensely, because, even though it was still more or less de facto segregated, it was a real city. Cummings strikes me as an old-fashioned machine kind of politician, although the machine has changed as it constituent parts have changed, and one who, when he had his opportunity on the bigger stages, didn't let that constituency down. RIP
Wednesday, 9 October 2019
DANIEL SILVA'S ENGLISH SPY
The English Spy is
the first novel by Daniel Silva I have read, but it is instructive in
revealing some of the secrets of his immense popularity in spy
fiction. The story begins with the detonation of a bomb aboard a
yacht, which kills an English princess, part Diana part Kate, and
sparks a massive investigation. The early signs lead English spy
chief Graham Seymour, engaged in an ongoing feud/battle with the head of MI5 who is his former boss, to enlist the help of the Israelis, who have identified the killer.'He's an old friend' says the head of Mossad. 'Of yours, or ours?' asks Seymoure. 'Of yours', Uzi Navot replies. 'We have no friends.' Which means
Silva's Gabriel Allen, the art restorer about to become head of the
Mossad, comes on board. And because they are chasing after a former
IRA bomb maker turned international terrorist named Eamonn Quinn, the
two men turn to Christopher Keller, an assassin who once knew Quinn
while he was infiltrating the IRA on behalf of the British.
From this beginning
flows an international game of cat and mouse, a plot that is so
inventive it was surprising Quinn, who appears to have structured
much of it, does not get enough credit for the brilliance of his
plan. And of course, it all points back to Ireland, recalling the
past killings and betrayals that are the mark of international spies
and assassins.
Allen, in many ways,
is the English spy of the title; or perhaps it's Keller, and the two
make an interesting pair, one which seems to have been set up for the
future (note: I have not read further, or indeed back, in the saga,
of which this is the fifteenth). In Silva's world the English are
the civilised masters of the game, the Israelis are the harder edged
forces having to deal with a more violent reality. Allen is the
exception; the Israeli who to all extents and purposes is the very
model of a modern MI operative. Their opponents, Irish or Arab, are
almost universally evil, a lesser breed. And the Americans are the
bulls in the china shop, blundering, unsophisticated, unreliable.
It's an interesting world view. It's the sort of stuff I used to see
businessmen reading in the business class lounge at Dusseldorf
airport.
The story comes down
to personal face to face violence. There are two former Russian
sleeper agents involved, there are hints of lost love, and all the
while Silva's new, Italian wife, is about to give birth in an Israeli
hospital. The resolution makes sense, although there is a coda which
is appropriate enough, but seems somehow forced, given the nature of
Quinn and Keller. There is nothing fancy about Silva's prose, but he
keeps the plot moving at a good pace and, as I said, the plot is
immensely satisfying.
The English Spy by
Daniel Silva
Harper Collins £8.99
ISBN 9870007552337
BREXIT: A MODEST PROPOSAL My suggestions via Arc Digital
I've written a piece for Arc Digital suggesting an easy way to make the current conundrum over Brexit something more bearable, entertaining and successful for all concerned. The piece was recommended to readers on Medium, in their World section, and they have provided a link by which you can read it and laugh without necessarily having to subscribe there, though that's not a bad idea. You can find that link here....happy reading
Monday, 30 September 2019
JOSEPH WILSON: THE GUARDIAN OBITUARY
My obit of Joseph C Wilson, the former US Ambassador who went to Niger to investigate whether Iraq was trying to buy uranium, and discovered that, contrary to the Bush administration's claims, they weren't, is online on the Guardian's website now. You can link to it here. It will appear in the paper paper soon.
It is pretty much as I wrote it. Having to condense the whole business and combine it with Wilson's life made for little excess to cut away! I was amazed at the relatively easy the road to entering governmental service seemed to be for both Plame and Wilson. It might have been nice to expand the whistleblower motif to today's situation, where the case for keeping secret the identity of the CIA whistleblower re Trump's Ukraine phone call is reinforced by the Plame Affair. I also would have liked to have more detail about the Wilson/Clinton relationship; I wonder who would play Clinton in that movie. I've never seen Fair Game but I might have to now after seeing the still the Guardian printed: it's interesting how much less serious Sean Penn and Naomi Watts look than their real life counterparts, and how it's actually Plame who's flattered by the actor portraying her.
It is pretty much as I wrote it. Having to condense the whole business and combine it with Wilson's life made for little excess to cut away! I was amazed at the relatively easy the road to entering governmental service seemed to be for both Plame and Wilson. It might have been nice to expand the whistleblower motif to today's situation, where the case for keeping secret the identity of the CIA whistleblower re Trump's Ukraine phone call is reinforced by the Plame Affair. I also would have liked to have more detail about the Wilson/Clinton relationship; I wonder who would play Clinton in that movie. I've never seen Fair Game but I might have to now after seeing the still the Guardian printed: it's interesting how much less serious Sean Penn and Naomi Watts look than their real life counterparts, and how it's actually Plame who's flattered by the actor portraying her.
Thursday, 5 September 2019
BIG GAME: LIFESTYLES OF THE RICH AND FOOTBALL FAMOUS
There is an interesting moment in Big Game when author Mark Leibovich mentions he had been reading 'an old book about the NFL, The League, by David Harris. It's a throwaway (the book is not mentioned in the index) because he's identifying where he first heard the story of Mark Davis' bar-mitzvah (Davis, son of Al, is now the Raiders' owner). Big Game is a strange book, because it basically cannot do what it purports to want to do, which is examine the NFL in the 'dangerous times' of Donald Trump, but in essence that is exactly what David Harris' book did, in 1986, which hardly makes it an 'old' book. Harris already saw the NFL in decline, and wrote about the way the business functioned as it became a sort of corporate monopoly. The NFL has prospered exponentially since then but Harris was also prescient in the very sense that Leibovich wants to examine, the sense that the league is a mirror and a signpost for American society. In the end, however, his book turns out to be more a part of that mirror than a signpost toward a better future.
The book instead is a sort of corollary to Leibovich's main gig writing from Washington about life styles for the New York Times magazine, a Sunday colour supplement that celebrates celebrity at the same time it bemoans its pernicious influence. Given that the book was written at the time Donald Trump (himself a frustrated NFL owner) was attacking the NFL (which is heavily dependent on its exemption from government monopoly regulation) this created a perfect storm for Leibovich to investigate, if not exploit. Which is odd also in the sense that, to an American audience of football fans, there will be little here that is new, while to a British audience, much that needs to be explained is left unexplained because the American audience already knows the stories. Leibovich admits he doesn't always cover football, which makes him somewhat similar to his New York Times colleague who covers horse racing but is crdentialed next to him in the Super Bowl press box because, well, this is the New York Times.
Leibovich is a Patriots fan too, which puts him in the centre of the Ballghazi (aka Deflategate) scandal, which is not really the best way to approach the structural truths about the NFL. Instead he tries to draw a metaphoric connection between the Patriots, Bob Kraft, Tom Brady, Bill Belichick and Trump (not a difficult connection so far, as the three Pats are Trump 'friends', and Kraft at least was a major donor). It takes him until election night, watching future ambassador to the UK and New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, to make that connection, and he decides he has grown 'weary of the … moral agonizing that surrounded the game'. It was as if he had only just then discovered NFL owners, as he puts it, 'with few exceptions, lean Republican'. The way Gronk laying out for a pass may be said to be 'leaning' just before his body smashes against the turf. He concludes that 'for consumers of football, politics and life in America, this had been a brutal season.' Before you say 'no shit Sherlock', you need to consider he never really explains whence that brutality comes.
So what you get is really Lifestyles Of The Rich And Football Famous, which is somewhat revealing and sometimes entertaining, but never really on message. Unless the message is that the NFL is, for its owners, a different sort of big game, which would contradict the book's subtitles, since the times don't seem that dangerous to them, especially as the money continues to roll in. Like F Scott Fitzgerald, Leibovich has discovered the rich are different from you and me, and he's sharp enough to realise that Commissioner Roger Goodell's selling of the NFL as a liberation for the boring workaday lives of average Joes, is a sham...like a sort of reality TV.
But he admits that he is also a fan, and he seems to be seeking solace of his own when he interviews Tom Brady for a NYTimes Magazine profile, and Brady, while seeming perfectly pleasant in a business-like way, misses the chance to befriend him. All of a sudden he's lost in a sort of limbo where the celebrity life-style of the marketing TB12, the sort of thing he normally celebrates, conflicts with his idea of the game. Who would have thought? That's WHY the Times sent him!
Leibovich is a Patriots fan too, which puts him in the centre of the Ballghazi (aka Deflategate) scandal, which is not really the best way to approach the structural truths about the NFL. Instead he tries to draw a metaphoric connection between the Patriots, Bob Kraft, Tom Brady, Bill Belichick and Trump (not a difficult connection so far, as the three Pats are Trump 'friends', and Kraft at least was a major donor). It takes him until election night, watching future ambassador to the UK and New York Jets owner Woody Johnson, to make that connection, and he decides he has grown 'weary of the … moral agonizing that surrounded the game'. It was as if he had only just then discovered NFL owners, as he puts it, 'with few exceptions, lean Republican'. The way Gronk laying out for a pass may be said to be 'leaning' just before his body smashes against the turf. He concludes that 'for consumers of football, politics and life in America, this had been a brutal season.' Before you say 'no shit Sherlock', you need to consider he never really explains whence that brutality comes.
So what you get is really Lifestyles Of The Rich And Football Famous, which is somewhat revealing and sometimes entertaining, but never really on message. Unless the message is that the NFL is, for its owners, a different sort of big game, which would contradict the book's subtitles, since the times don't seem that dangerous to them, especially as the money continues to roll in. Like F Scott Fitzgerald, Leibovich has discovered the rich are different from you and me, and he's sharp enough to realise that Commissioner Roger Goodell's selling of the NFL as a liberation for the boring workaday lives of average Joes, is a sham...like a sort of reality TV.
But he admits that he is also a fan, and he seems to be seeking solace of his own when he interviews Tom Brady for a NYTimes Magazine profile, and Brady, while seeming perfectly pleasant in a business-like way, misses the chance to befriend him. All of a sudden he's lost in a sort of limbo where the celebrity life-style of the marketing TB12, the sort of thing he normally celebrates, conflicts with his idea of the game. Who would have thought? That's WHY the Times sent him!
It's also no fun to read about his difficulties with access—it reminded me of Richard Hoffer's book about Mike Tyson, where Don King is boycotting Sports Illustrated because they are part of the Time Warner empire alongside HBO, and Hoffer can't get any access, and all the best lines in his book are quotes from boxing beat writers. Then again, Leibovich can't fit that into the bigger picture: it's not easy, like when he deals with owners. But he does write very well and movingly about his own father, who was dying at the time, beyond trying to link the event to Brady's parents.
He's very funny about the owners as they parade around meetings with their latest trophy wives or girlfriends (and Kraft's deflations at a Florida massage parlor just down the road from Mar A Lago would have been more grist for that mill). They come off, so to speak, like richer proctologists at a proctologists convention, and the very best scene in the book comes when he spends some time interviewing Jerry Jones in his private bus, drinking Johnny Walker Blue from giant Cowboys 24 oz plastic stadium cups. Jones leaves him passed out in the trailer. It's Jones who has the best line in the book: “Do you think the (TV) networks pay these rights fees to broke dicks? With their asses hanging out?” But sadly, he never talks to a network exec, or a former network exec without a skin in the game.
There is a constant irritation in the book when you realise it's been pieced together from various separate interviews (composted, too, meaning the use of off-cut material from earlier interviews) as characters get reintroduced, one, Indianapolis sportswriter Bob Kravitz, at the heart of Ballghazi (aka Deflategate) (see how irritating that is the second time?) twice within the space of five pages. And there are insights like 'pie is delicious' which seem less than revelatory. But perhaps the real problem is, as Leibovich says, “football is football, angst is for writers”. Perhaps a contrast of the real angst of football with the faux-angst of 'protecting the Shield' and keeping the cash flowing might have been more instructive.
BIG GAME: The NFL In Dangerous Times
by Mark Leibovich
Harper Collins £16.99 ISBN 9780008317614
He's very funny about the owners as they parade around meetings with their latest trophy wives or girlfriends (and Kraft's deflations at a Florida massage parlor just down the road from Mar A Lago would have been more grist for that mill). They come off, so to speak, like richer proctologists at a proctologists convention, and the very best scene in the book comes when he spends some time interviewing Jerry Jones in his private bus, drinking Johnny Walker Blue from giant Cowboys 24 oz plastic stadium cups. Jones leaves him passed out in the trailer. It's Jones who has the best line in the book: “Do you think the (TV) networks pay these rights fees to broke dicks? With their asses hanging out?” But sadly, he never talks to a network exec, or a former network exec without a skin in the game.
There is a constant irritation in the book when you realise it's been pieced together from various separate interviews (composted, too, meaning the use of off-cut material from earlier interviews) as characters get reintroduced, one, Indianapolis sportswriter Bob Kravitz, at the heart of Ballghazi (aka Deflategate) (see how irritating that is the second time?) twice within the space of five pages. And there are insights like 'pie is delicious' which seem less than revelatory. But perhaps the real problem is, as Leibovich says, “football is football, angst is for writers”. Perhaps a contrast of the real angst of football with the faux-angst of 'protecting the Shield' and keeping the cash flowing might have been more instructive.
BIG GAME: The NFL In Dangerous Times
by Mark Leibovich
Harper Collins £16.99 ISBN 9780008317614
Thursday, 29 August 2019
FOOTBALL IS UPON US: MUCH MORE MIKE
The NFL season is rapidly approaching, and I've done a couple of deep previews of it. The first. which I wrote at the beginning of August, has just been published in The American magazine here in the UK. You can read it in print or online; go to this link for details. It picks all the divisions and also previews the four games in London this fall.
Then this week I did another, more detailed, preview for Betfair: grouping teams by Elite, Contenders, Dark Horses, Pretenders, and Forget It. Where did your team get slotted? Check it out at Betfair here. There will also be a Betfair video podcast up next week just before the season starts.
And of course if you're really hard-core and want complete run-downs you can go to my patreon site right here and read my off-season run downs of each team. They're done division by division, with looks at the full roster. There will be a feature or two next week before I start picking every game of the season with my Friday Morning Tight End column--67% right last year.
Then this week I did another, more detailed, preview for Betfair: grouping teams by Elite, Contenders, Dark Horses, Pretenders, and Forget It. Where did your team get slotted? Check it out at Betfair here. There will also be a Betfair video podcast up next week just before the season starts.
And of course if you're really hard-core and want complete run-downs you can go to my patreon site right here and read my off-season run downs of each team. They're done division by division, with looks at the full roster. There will be a feature or two next week before I start picking every game of the season with my Friday Morning Tight End column--67% right last year.
Monday, 26 August 2019
JIM BOUTON: THE LAST WORD
Although I'd recorded the interview with Matthew Bannister a month ago, my appreciation of Jim Bouton has just been broadcast on BBC Radio 4's Last Word. It's a wonderful show: it begins with Peter Fonda and ends with Bouton: two icons of Sixties rebellion, of counter-culture, from different ends of the American spectrum. You can listen to the show on BBC IPlayer (actually now rebranded Sounds! to appeal to those too young to seek out obituary programmes) with this link . Fonda leads off the show; my bit is at the end, starting around 21 mins. The rest of the show is as interesting as usual, but I do love the way Fonda and Bouton play off against each other.
In case you missed my story at Arc Digital, going into more detail, you can link to that here.
In case you missed my story at Arc Digital, going into more detail, you can link to that here.
Monday, 19 August 2019
NICK BUONICONTI: HIS FOOTBALL LIFE
Nick Buoniconti was
unique in being a player from the era before free agency who is
remembered a being crucial and beloved by fans of two teams. Nowadays
we are used to players who move from team to team, often at their
peaks, often collecting rings along the way. Previously, talented
players were moved only when their original teams either thought they
were on the decline or suffered a personality clash. Norm Van
Brocklin from the Rams to the Eagles and a title. Sonny Jurgensen
from the Eagles to the Redskins, and beloved by both sets of fans.
Some moved toward the ends of their careers (coaches like George
Allen specialised in picking them up) but their peak at their new
clubs was short (think Sam Huff, NY Football Giants to Washington).
Buoniconti went to from the Patriots to the Dolphins when he was
still at his peak, and stayed there for another six seasons that
brought two Super Bowl titles and of course the only undefeated,
untied season in NFL history.
He went to Notre
Dame, who recruited him out of Springfield (Mass) Cathedral High,
which had produced Angelo Bertelli, the Irish’s first Heisman
winner. He played both ways, at guard and linebacker/middle guard,
but was overshadowed on the line by big tackle Myron Pottios. He was
considered undersized for the NFL. Which wasn’t an exaggeration;
he basically played at 5-11 220. He wasn’t much smaller than
someone like Lee Roy Jordan, but southern players had the reputation
of being faster harder hitters.
He wasn’t picked
in the NFL draft, and went to the Boston Patriots in round 13 of the
AFL draft (pick 102 overall). The Pats might have taken a flyer on
him because as a former all-stat player from Massachusetts, he was
relatively local. Mike Holovak was the head coach and Marion Campbell
might have been the guy to see the potential for him at linebacker.
Remember the original 4-3 defenses often had middle guards simply
step back and play off the line; Bill George is sometimes called the
first, Huff was another. In an odd front, the nose guard basically
played a read and react game; if you watch Buoniconti you’ll see
how that transitioned into playing MLB.
Buoniconti;s
instincts were perfect, his pursuit relentless, but he also had ball
skills; he intercepted 32 passes over his career. Dolphin fans might
compare him to someone like Zach Thomas, especially if he hadn’t
been pumped up to carry more weight, smoother in his drops and better
with his hands. London Fletcher might be another good modern
comparison.
In 1963 he played in
the AFL All-Star game; the next four seasons he was also first-team
all-AFL. In 68 he played only 8 games (second team all-AFL), but
someone on the Pats , probably owner Billy Sullivan, felt he was on
the decline, and he was traded to the Dolphins in 1969, for LB John
Bramlett and Q, B Kim Hammond. Bramlett was a decent player but
Hammond, the key to the deal, never made it. Nick, meanwhile, was
again first-team all AFL.
The Dolphins were
acquiring some of the core of their great teams: they traded for
Larry Little in 69, and in 1970 for Paul Warfield and of course head
coach Don Shula, each of whom cost them a first-round pick (they were
fined for ‘tampering’ with Shula before his Colts’ contract had
expired). With Bill Arnsparger as the defensive coordinator,
Buoniconti became the perfect middle linebacker in what became the 53
D: with an outside backer used as a rush end. When I consider one of
the starting OLBs on that team was Doug Swift, against whom I played
when he was dominant at D3 Amherst, but who had previously been cut
by the CFL’s Alouettes, it gives me huge respect for the quality of
the coaching and the smarts of that D, and Buoniconti was its core.
Don Shula once said that after their 1972 season, when he and
Arnsbarger reviewed the film of the season, they found only 11 mental
errors all season. That was 11 from the whole defense.
It was also finally
his chance to play on a winner. His three varsity years at Notre Dame
under Joe Kuharich had all been losing seasons—Kuharich never was
able to recreate his success at San Francisco, about which I wrote a
few months ago, anywhere else. The Pats went to the AFL championship
in 1963, where they were smashed by the Chargers, then lapsed into
mediocrity.
Buoniconti had gone
to law school while he played for the Patriots, and after retiring he
was for a time a lawyer. He acted as an agent for baseball players
(Boston fans needed to think twice about his representing the
Yankees’ Bucky Dent) and he was for a time president of the US
Tobacco Company—who secialised in the smokeless tobacco which
caused mouth cancers; he was a leading figure in trying to dismiss
such studies.
But the fulcrum of
his later life came in 1985 when his son Marc, playing linebacker at
The Citadel, suffered a spinal cord injury and was left a
quadriplegic. He set up a charity, the Miami Project to Cure
Paralysis, and became a public spokesman. Later in his career he
would turn to media and present Inside The NFL, where his analysis of
games was just as sharp as it had been as a linebacker.
Buoniconti himself
began showing signs of CTE in his later years, and he joined the
campaign to limit youngsters to playing flag football. He donated his
brain to CTE research at Boston University. HBO made a documentary,
The Many Lives Of Nick Buoniconti, which aired this year. His life is
a catalogue of the high and lows of the sport,
just as his career
was. And he is a member of the Pro Football Hall of Fame, as well as
the team halls of both the Patriots and the Dolphins.
Friday, 16 August 2019
ANDREAS NORMAN'S SILENT WAR
Many of the greatest
writers of espionage fiction have been fascinated by the idea of
betrayal, and the ways in which its being stock in trade for a spy
means it must necessarily become part of the personal lives of those
involved in the great game. It is the essence of John LeCarre, but he
is far from alone in building on E.M. Forster’s famous dictum
about having the courage to choose friend over country.
For starters, a spy
must keep his or her work secret, which means having secrets, lying,
to those you supposedly love. And of course, because they are
practiced liars trained in deception and, by definition, believers in
ends justifying means, it is no surprise that this paradox rears its
ugly head frequently.
But few writers have
put it at the centre of a novel quite the way Andreas Norman has in
The Silent War, which opens
with the head of Swedish intelligence in Brussels, Bente Jensen,
being passed files which reveal a British programme of torture
carried out at a secret site in the Middle East. This will put her at
odds with the Brussels station chief of MI6, Jonathan Green, and
the scene is set at an embassy reception in which quick glances and a
partner absent for just a short while begin a tale in which every
relationship is never quite what it seems.
What
makes it work is the way the personal morality gets in the way of the
larger issues of political morality, and it is odd that Norman, a
former Swedish diplomat, is most cutting in the relationship of Green
and his MI6 friend and colleague with whom he is at least nominally
competing for a deputy directorship, Like honourable schoolboys,
theirs is perhaps the most telling and coldblooded in the book.
What
doesn’t quite work is the nature of Jensen and Green’s past, of
which there are hints but no definition—it seems personal from the
start, but it doesn’t go that far. Green’s operation in Syria and
his final efforts to contain the leaked documents add action to the
story, but the real action is what takes place behind the scenes. The
book is best when it is focused on betrayal, and in the end, those
who are the best at it are the ones who gain the ultimate victory.
The
Silent War by Andreas Norman
translated
from the Swedish by Ian Giles
Riverun,
£20, ISBN 9781784293628
published
5 September 2019
NOTE: This review will also appear at Crime Time (www.crimetime.co.uk)
THE WOODSTOCK JAZZ BAND THAT WASN'T: THE FIFTIETH ANNIVERSARY
Looking yet again at
Woodstock for its 50th anniversary, I was struck by the
full lineup of musicians who played – those who missed the cut for
the movie have assumed a sort of ghost form in the public memory.
What jumped out at me was that you could have formed a nice ECM-style
trio there.
Tim Hardin lived in
Woodstock, and because he was there the organisers apparently wanted
him to open when scheduling acts were showing up late because of the
traffic jams. But Hardin had two longer journeys to make that day:
first he was a junkie and second he suffered from stage fright. It is
not inconceivable those two conditions were related.
He played with a
band the first day that included Ralph Towner on guitar and piano and
Glen Moore on bass. A year later, those two would found Oregon, which
preceded the jazz-rock fusion with a kind of acoustic,
eastern-influenced jazz that prefigured both ECM and, at the other
end of a similar spectrum, the new age mood music of George Winston.
Towner’s Solstice band included Eberhard Weber and Jan Garbarek and
was a regular on my turntable as I wrote the poems of my master’s
thesis.
Hardin’s use of
jazz musicians wasn’t unusual. His album Tim Hardin 3, the year
before, had included Mike Manieri on vibes, Warren Bernhardt on piano
and Eddie Gomez on bass (as well as warning, in the liner notes,
about the bells drummer Donald McDonald was wearing being audible!
But I remember Bernhardt explaining once that because of nerves and
being strung out, Hardin would rarely play as rehearsed, missing
beats, adding things, and there was often as sense of their being out
of time with him. This is also how his set at Woodstock was
described, and it’s a shame, because the band also included Richard Bock on cello: Hardin was way ahead of his time in bring a wider palette of sounds to what had been 'folk' music: another junkie Tim, Tim Buckley, was doing something similar too.
Arlo Guthrie played
the next day and his drummer was the late Paul Motian, another of the
mainstays of ECM but someone who had already played with Bill Evans,
Paul Bley and Keith Jarrett before a brief stint with Arlo that
included the festival. Interestingly, he would go on to play mainly
with guitarists in small group situations, including an amazing trio
with Bill Frisell and saxophonist Joe Lovano, and wonderful stuff
with bassist Charlie Haden.
Towner, Moore and
Motian would have been a fantastic trio. I’m not sure if there
would have been a smooth way to fit David Sanborn into that group,
but of course he would go on to a huge career in jazz fusion. At
Woodstock he was still playing in the Paul Butterfield Blues Band’s
horn section, with Gene Dinwiddie and drummer Philip Wilson. I’d
maybe float them bassist Jim Fielder, one of the overlooked great
rock bassists, and trumpeter Lew Soloff from Blood Sweat and Tears
and make them some sort of fusion group.
It's not surprising that google reveals little in the way of pictures of back-up bands from Woodstock. It would have been nice to illustrate this exercise in building fantasy band lineups from 50 years ago...
Wednesday, 7 August 2019
DON WINSLOW'S BORDER
NOTE: This is the 1,200th post to this blog since I first posted a review of George Pelecanos' The Turnaround in July 2008. I like that symmetry, in part because I have written about Don Winslow often, going back before this blog, and I have been pleased with the way he has taken his career, much as Pelecanos did, from insider's favourite to major best-seller. As you'll see from this review, his success is well-deserved.
I was partway through The Border, following along with the battles between cartels and gangs to fill the power vacuum left in the Mexican drug trade, when I found myself, trying to keep track of who is a cousin of whom, and which section of Mexico they control or wish to control, wishing for a list of the characters, the kind of thing you would find at the start of an epic Russian novel. And it occurred to me at that moment that Don Winslow's War On Drugs trilogy, of which this is the final volume, is a crime fiction version of War And Peace.
I was partway through The Border, following along with the battles between cartels and gangs to fill the power vacuum left in the Mexican drug trade, when I found myself, trying to keep track of who is a cousin of whom, and which section of Mexico they control or wish to control, wishing for a list of the characters, the kind of thing you would find at the start of an epic Russian novel. And it occurred to me at that moment that Don Winslow's War On Drugs trilogy, of which this is the final volume, is a crime fiction version of War And Peace.
No, Don is not
Tolstoy, but as the scope of the narrative widens in his story, he
manages to do the most crucial thing any epic novel needs to do:
balance the stories of its main protagonists on the wider stage with
the stories of those affected by what happens on that stage. The
Border is balanced finely between Art Keller, the agent who has
battled through two novels and 40 years against the Sinaloa Cartel
and its rivals and successors, and the newly-embattled drug rivals.
Keller, the rebellious, uncontrollable agent, is now head of the DEA,
and mired in the Beltway politics which have always been at the heart
of the failure of drugs policy. Meanwhile Mexico is breaking out in
full-scale warfare between rival drug lords,
with the body counts threatening Keller's always tenuous position.
Meanwhile, a new
administration is taking over in Washington, a property developer
turned reality TV star, whose son in law deals with laundered money.
You may see the possibilities for conflicts of interests arising.
This plot strand attracted plenty of attention in America, for
obvious reasons, and Winslow to some extend has become a visible
spokesperson against 'The Wall' as well as on drug policy. It speaks
to his intimate knowledge, gleaned from agents and from journalists,
and one thing his writing makes clear is how dangerous a profession
being a journalist is among the cartels in Mexico; The Border is
dedicated to dozens who've sacrificed their lives.
For Keller, whose
fight against the cartels has cost him a family, the new job includes
a new turn in his relationship with Dr Marisol Cisneros, herself
physically a victim of drug violence. Keller has always had at least
a foot in both worlds, now he has his entire existence there. But
beneath that story, Winslow works the other end of the drug world:
the cops and dealers, the junkies and those who try to help them, the
refugees fleeing for safety to El Norte, their trip dangerous along
the way and difficult once they get there, because you cannot follow
the progress of the war without being aware of the lives torn apart
on its battlefields. This is epic writing at its layered best, and at
times the personal becomes almost unbearably tragic, even as the
large scale violence seems unbelievable, except that its real.
As impressive as The
Power Of The Dog was in 2005, it was impossible to conceive then
that, 15 years later, the story would have been continued through two
more novels, each getting better, more
nuanced, more textured even as they grow more epic. Sadly, this
trilogy may have concluded, but the drug wars, the border crisis,
have not.
The Border by Don
Winslow
Harper Collins, £20,
ISBN 9780008227531
note: this review will also appear at Crime Time (www.crimetime.co.uk)
Tuesday, 6 August 2019
THE MOON, MANSON & MUSIC: THE SUMMER OF 69
I've done a long essay on the Summer of 69 and the Age of Aquarius, the Moon, Manson and Music, which has just gone up at Medium. You can link to it, without joining, here. Please do, and if you like it, give it a clap...
Monday, 5 August 2019
THE IMPORTANCE OF NOT BEING EARNEST: A VERY ENGLISH STORY
In today's Torygraph we learn that Boris Johnson went on an Oxford Union debate beano to the USA in 1986. In the team of four was also the incoming head of the NHS, Simon Stevens. Over to theTelegraph:
"Boris Johnson, an Old Etonian, has been the centre-Right president of the Oxford Union, employing his waggish charm to cultivate loyal 'stooges' hanging on his every word. Simon Stevens, on the other hand, was from a Birmingham comprehensive, a member of the Labour Club and was far more earnest in his approach to student politics."
What more does a Telegraph reader need to know. As Kate Fox (and George Mikes before her) has pointed out, one of the first principles of Englishness is the importance of not being earnest.
But it gets worse: when they debate the Yanks, the debating styles were, according to the third member of the Four Englishmen of the Apocalypse,, Angus McCullough (now) QC, "glaringly different...the English relied on being entertaining, there was no greater sin than dullness, while the (Yanks were) seething with facts and statistics but tended to be turgid."
Oddly enough, however, the fourth member of the team was one Frank Luntz a double-ringer in that he was an American and also a graduate student, having already received his degree from Donald Trump's alma mater, the University of Pennsylvania. Luntz is now, of course, a leading political pollster, and frequent pundit on the BBC (obviously unconnected with that time at Oxford).
The article says Luntz is said to 'speak regularly with the Prime Minister*'. Although it identifies Michael Gove as one of the Stooges, it does not confer that honour onto Luntz. Note too, in the picture above which accompanied the article, Boris is actually dancing with his future first wife, Allegra Mostyn-Owen, but the paper declines to remind its readers of that. No need to be turgid.
ROBERT MORGENTHAU: THE DAILY TELEGRAPH OBITUARY
My obituary of Robert Morgenthau, the long-time district attorney for New York County, is in today's Telegraph, you can link to it online here; it is behind a paywall but you can do various deals with them. If you have the paper paper, note too the obit of Marcel Berlins, whom I knew as the crime reviewer for the Times, and who was always a welcome sight at book launches and the like. It's a excellent tribute to a fascinating erudite polymath.
My piece on Morgenthau is basically as I wrote it. The only thing missing was a slight mention of how, as DA for Kings County, he was able to transform the office into one that had the same remit as his previous post as US Attoryney for the Southern District of New York has enjoyed. He other words, he expanded its reach, particularly in terms of financial crime, often stretching the boundaries of jurisdiction with great effect. I alsoassumed his straightforward approach to nepotism would appeal to the English, though I refrained from saying that.
My piece on Morgenthau is basically as I wrote it. The only thing missing was a slight mention of how, as DA for Kings County, he was able to transform the office into one that had the same remit as his previous post as US Attoryney for the Southern District of New York has enjoyed. He other words, he expanded its reach, particularly in terms of financial crime, often stretching the boundaries of jurisdiction with great effect. I alsoassumed his straightforward approach to nepotism would appeal to the English, though I refrained from saying that.
Saturday, 3 August 2019
KEITH LINCOLN & THE CHARGERS: A TRIBUTE
It's hard for anyone
now to get an idea of what the San Diego (nee Los Angeles) Chargers
did to football in the early 1960s. Keith Lincoln's death at 80
reminded of that, because Lincoln, along side Lance Alworth, were the
glamorous face of the exciting Chargers team, with their lightning
bolt uniforms and helmets and Sid Gillman's passing concepts, that
seemed to shine a bright sunny light on football. They were both
movie-star handsome, and had the Chargers stayed in LA I don't doubt
they would have been offered acting careers: if Merlin Olsen, Roman
Gabriel and Fred Dryer of the Rams, could, why not?
Lincoln played for
the Chargers from their second year, 1961, through 1966, when they
were probably the best team in the AFL. And boasted a number of my
favourite players. Their defense had the original Fearsome Foursome, before the LA Rams stole the term: Ron Nery, Bill Hydson, Earl Faison and Ernie 'The Big
Cat' Ladd. The first game I ever saw Faison he wreaked havoc from the
end position; I was in awe of him from then on. I had already watched Ladd wreak havoc in the wrestling ring. Their O line had the best pair of tackles in the NFL in
Ernie Wright and Ron Mix 'The Intellectual Assassin'. Mix, the first
of the dominant tackles from USC remains one of the top half-dozen or
so of all time (see him, 74, leading Lincoln in the picture bottom right. The tight end was Dave Kocurek. Alworth, known as
Bambi, would be the third receiver on the all-century team, alongside
Jerry Rice and Don Hutson. They had Jack Kemp, then Tobin Rote and
finally John Hadl at quarterback. Hadl and Alworth, with their
single-bar helmets, Alworth wearing 19 and Hadl 21, were cool beyond
words. And they had Paul Lowe at halfback, which meant Lincoln (6-1
215) nominally played fullback, and the two shared carries.
The Chargers 1963
team, who beat the Patriots 53-10 for the AFL title, were probably
the best AFL team until at least 1966. In fact they would have been a
tough matchup for the NFL champion Bears. Lincoln was the MVP of that
title game. He rushed 13 times for 206 yards and a TD. He caught 7
passes for 123 more yards and another TD. The total yardage record
was broken with the aid of overtime by Ed Podolak, the rushing mark
by Eric Dickerson two decades later. He also completed an option pass
for 20 yards.
Lincoln came from
California, but went to Washington State as a quarterback. He was
soon moved to halfback, where he held school records for rushing and
punting, and threw for 511 yards and 8 TDs on options. He would have
been, just a few years earlier, a single-wing tailback. His nickname
was 'the Moose of the Palouse,' Palouse being the farming area
encompassing the southeast part of Washington and parts of Oregon and
Idaho. After his career he moved back to Pullman, eventually becoming
an alumni director.
In 1964 the Chargers
lost to the Bills (and Jack Kemp, whom Gillman had let go by trying
to sneak him through waivers) and Lincoln was knocked out of the game
by Buffalo line-backer Mike Stratton. It was a swing pass, and
Lincoln had bobbled the ball when Stratton laid him out with a hit
often likened to Chuck Bednarik's on Frank Gifford, the AFL's 'hit
heard round the world'. Lincoln left the game with bruised ribs,
though a week later he came back to take the MVP trophy home from the
AFL All-Star game.
The Chargers success
seemed to flip on that moment, but really it was a combination of
things. Gillman lost his defensive mastermind, Chuck Noll, to the
NFL's Colts, who became a great defensive team in the late 60s. Al
Davis, another Gillman assistant, was turning the Raiders into an
upstate version of the Chargers, with even more emphasis on the deep
game. The Chiefs and Jets were building strong teams. But Gillman
also had an edgy relationship with some of his players, especially
those who wanted more money. Ladd and Faison both held out and were
traded to Houston; they were both becoming less effective due to
injuries. Lincoln wanted out too; after an off-year in '66, in 1967 he was traded to Buffalo
even up for all-league defensive end Tom Day. He had an excellent
season with the Bills, rushing for 'only' 601 yards but catching 41
passes for 558, a 13.6 yards per catch, and five TDs. But he was hurt
in '68, released by the Bills and played briefly for the Chargers
again before retiring.
Lincoln was first
team all-AFL in 1963 and 64, and an all-star for five years, 62-67,
except 1966. That twice all-league/five all-star record matches up
well with the 'official' all-AFL team, which has Clem Daniels (2/4)
and Lowe (2/2) as first-team running backs, and Abner Haynes (2/3) and
Cookie Gilchrist (3/4) but not Lincoln. It' a tough call, especially
because both Cookie and Lincoln were both fullbacks, but I'd be
tempted to list the two as my first-teamers. I like to imagine them together on the same Buffalo team. But I think Lincoln is really only a
border-line Hall Of Famer, especially because, like baseball's Roger
Maris, he's remembered for one big game above all else.More likely he will remain in the Hall of the Very Good, and first teamer on the all glamour football squad. And he will remain
in my mind as part of the most exciting football team of my youth,
and the kind of All-American triple threat football player who doesn't seem to really exist,
without the hype, these days.
And I was somehow
pleased as well as touched to discover that Lincoln is survived by two
sons, named Lance and Keith.
BELFAST, BOXING & EAMONN MAGEE: MY MEDIUM/LONDON REVIEW OF BOOKS ESSAY
Last November I was commissioned by the London Review Of Books to write a long essay on The Lost Soul Of Eamonn Magee, a biography of the Belfast boxer. As I filed the piece, the book was joint winner of the William Hill prize for sports book of the year, which I thought might get it into print quickly. As it happened, I got the proofs of the story, very nicely edited, in March. But it got bumped from its scheduled publication then, and when I checked on it four months later, was told it was now out of date, and with summer holidays at the paper about to begin, it was killed.
The story itself is certainly not out of date: whether you consider it about Magee himself, about boxing in general, or about Northern Ireland and the society and culture in which Magee grew up. So the essay is now up at Medium, you can link to it here. Read it and if you like it, please give it a clap.
The story itself is certainly not out of date: whether you consider it about Magee himself, about boxing in general, or about Northern Ireland and the society and culture in which Magee grew up. So the essay is now up at Medium, you can link to it here. Read it and if you like it, please give it a clap.
Tuesday, 30 July 2019
THE BREXIT OUROBOROS: BORIS JOHNSON, TRUMP & BREXIT
I've done another Brexit piece for Arc Digital, this one about Johnson's ascendancy to No. 10 Downing Street, his relation to Trump, and the future for Britain and Brexit. Just a few small topics. You can find it here. The ouroboros title went by the wayside, but it was all I could do not to call it the Ouroboris, the worm that eats its own tail. Which is basically what Britain is doing via Brexit. And Boris. Give it a clap if you enjoy it.
I actually has a paragraph comparing Johnson and Trump to King Gorice and Goldy Bluszco (you can guess which one is which, I hope) from E.R. Eddison's Worm Ouroboros, until I realised that if no one would know what ouroboros meant, even fewer would have read Eddison's fantasy novel (now you know!).
I actually has a paragraph comparing Johnson and Trump to King Gorice and Goldy Bluszco (you can guess which one is which, I hope) from E.R. Eddison's Worm Ouroboros, until I realised that if no one would know what ouroboros meant, even fewer would have read Eddison's fantasy novel (now you know!).
Monday, 29 July 2019
ROBERT CRAIS' DANGEROUS MAN
Isabel Roland is a
bank teller, and one of her customers is Joe Pike. Pike, as ever, is
a quiet enigma, but Isabel and especially her colleague Dana both
think he's hot. After Pike leaves, Isabel goes to lunch, and as she
hits the sidewalk, she's forced into a car and two men drive away
with her. But Joe Pike had just got into his car across the street,
and he's seen what happened. It was quick, but it didn't feel right.
A few blocks later, at a light, Pike disables the men and rescues
Isabel. Before he did, the men had told her 'we know your secret.' Which is more than she does, but it's enough to get Pike and Elvis Cole involved with some ruthless killers
Last year when I
reviewed Robert Crais' The Wanted, I
concentrated on the personal stories underneath the fast-paced
thriller; contrasting stories of parents and children as well as two
entertaining if cold-blooded killers. Dangerous Man is even
faster-paced, a relentless series of track-downs and races against
time which meant I was able to literally recapitulate the
'page-turner' and 'unputdownable' critics' cliches, because I read
the book the day it arrived.
It's different from
The Wanted, except perhaps for the beachside gunfight that climaxes
the chase. Again there is a parental angle, but it's simply
background. The villains don't have much in the way of personality,
it's a bigger crew working for a second crew working for an anonymous
villain off-stage. But after I finished Dangerous Man, I happened to
watch the pilot episode of the overlooked Stephen J Cannell TV show
Wise Guy. Elvis Cole had
referenced himself to Jim Rockford (perhaps Cannell's best, see my obit in the Independent) at
one point in the novel, and it occurred to me that Crais, who started
writing TV crime shows during the Rockford era, had
written this scene by scene, in what would have been an epic Rockford episode, if Rockford
had come up with a partner like Joe Pike. The movement between the
scenes, which buffers the fast pace, the relaxed dialogue even as the
pressure intensifies, and the now-expected confrontation with federal
marshals who are looking for the same killers, who tortured one of
their retired colleagues at the start of their quest that roped in
Roland.
You'd
think Joe Pike is a bit too old for Isabel Roland, and she's a bit
too much of an innocent civilian for him, but the strange prospect is
also fun to consider, jarring as it is to hear the young tellers
refer to Joe as a 'studburger' or 'manmeat on a stick'. With the
right casting, this would be a hell of pilot for the Elvis and Joe
Show. But I am more than content to have the story between covers,
because how these days how many books do I simply sit down and read
to the end before getting up? Not too many.
Dangerous
Man by Robert Crais
Simon
& Shuster, £16.99, ISBN 9781471157615
Note:
This review will also appear at Crime Time (www.crimetime.co.uk)
Tuesday, 23 July 2019
MIKE MIGNOLA'S WITCHFINDER
Mike Mignola's
Witchfinder is an unsurprising offshoot of his Bureau For Paranormal
Research and Defense. Sir Edward Grey has been knighted for his role
in saving Queen Victoria from a cabal of witches, and in the first
volume of this series, In The Service Of Angels, he is working
for the government investigating a series of bloody killings in
London. Whatever is doing the killing is linked to an archaeological
expedition that found one of the seven lost cities of the Hyperborean
Age, and as Grey digs deeper he encounters a secret society, the
Heliopic Brotherhood of Ra, who may be allies of a sort, or enemies.
In supernatural
detective stories, the suspense revolves around first discovering
what the danger actually is,
and then in how to defeat it. Grey, interestingly, is as much acted
upon as actor, and Ben Stenbeck's drawing of him emphasises this: he
is not easily surprised, but he does seem very cautious. Which helps
this story work well, because it is the surrounding cast which is
more interesting: think back to the prototypes like Fu Manchu, and
how Nayland Smith is as much as anything a catalyst for the real
horrors or sometimes wonders they encounter. The most fascinating of
whom is Miss Mary Wolf, a psychic whose visions put the story into
perspective. The other thing which works well is Stenbeck's evoking
of the Victorian era; we've seen it so many times it risks being
cliched, but he finds nice little touches to make it new.
What intrigues me
most about the story are the references to other cases which Grey has
already encountered, which, like the throwaway mentions in Sherlock
Holmes, illuminate only slightly, but pique the curiosity. Given that
much of Grey's backstory remains hidden to the reader, that curiosity
is strong.
But it isn't
answered in the second volume Lost And Gone Forever, written
by Mignola and John Arcudi with art by John Severin. Since the story
is set in the American West a year after the events of the first
volume. Severin was a great artist of westerns in the Silver Age, and
he brings the same sort of background perspective to the story that
Stenbeck did to Victorian London; the details are both realistic and
revealing. The story itself is a bit less focused: Grey is tracking a
Lord Glaren from London all the way across America, and arrives in
Reidlynne, Utah, where there is something strange at the church, and
the locals don't take kindly to questions. He's rescued by a Bill
Hickock type named Morgan Kaler, who's accompanied by a backward
youth named Issac (there was a similar character in Service Of
Angels, Grey is good with the simple-minded) who is older than he
appears.
There is also a
white woman named Eris leading a group of Indians intent on some sort
of revival of their gods and a full spectrum of spectres, including
Glaren, wolves and various spirits. It's a full story, perhaps too
full, and Kaler in particular might have been fleshed out a bit more.
It would be too much to say Grey works better, by definition in
Victorian England, but he and his antagonists here seem to be on
different planes.
By the way, there's
a short story at the end of the first volume featuring another
witch-hunter, Henry Hood, in 1667. It's a nice six-pager, but the
interesting thing is the presentation of Hood, who reminds me
immediately of Robert E Howard's Solomon Kane, still to my mind the
best of the witch-hunter characters.
Witchfinder: In
The Service Of Angels by Mike Mignola art by Ben Stenbeck (Dark Horse
Books, £13.50, ISBN 9781595824837)
Witchfinder: Lost
and Gone Forever by Mike Mignola and John Arcudi art by John Severin
(Dark Horse
Books, £13.50, ISBN 9781595827944)
Sunday, 21 July 2019
BORIS JOHNSON, FINTAN O'TOOLE AND ROGER BARLOW: LITERARY EXEGESIS OF AN ALTER EGO
Fintan O'Toole, whose essay about Boris Johnson, titled 'The Ham Of Fate' (in the current issue of the New York Review of Books, you can link to it here) goes full Gore Vidal in a literary exegesis of Johnson's only published novel, Seventy-Two Virgins (2004). O'Toole calls it, generously, a 'somewhat un-flattering self-portrait', but that is all part of the 'Boris' shtick, public schoolboy humour combined with the famed self-deprecation which, as any student of George Mikes would recognise, is actually a celebration of the innate superiority of the English, or at least the English upper-class, over those of lesser character who insist on speaking honestly, straightforwardly or worst of all, as O'Toole quotes Kate Fox reminding us, earnestly.
O'Toole's coup de grace is an analysis of Johnson's dropping in of the Greek word 'akratic' to describe his protagonist. Johnson uses it alongside describing a 'thanatos urge', or death-wish to those of us who didn't study Greek at Eton. But most educated readers would recognise 'thanatos', which makes 'akratic' worth O'Toole's analysis. He explains that 'akrasia', according to Aristotle, is the opposite of control, a weakness of will, incontinence, a person who, O'Toole summarises, 'knows the right thing but cannot help doing the opposite'.
The 'studied careless' of those English upper-classes Johnson (from, as O'Toole notes, a rather bohemian bourgeois background) apes leaves messes for others to clean up. He is of course both 'genuinely clever' and 'quite self-aware', and in the familiar tracing of Johnson's indecision over his stance on Brexit (choosing the one with the clearer, but risky, path to leadership) or his mendaciousness as a Brussels journalist ('he understood a vivid lie is more memorable than the dull truth'). Read the article, because O'Toole is equally sharp tracing of Boris' efforts to re-invent himself as a bumbling, betraying Churchill is part and parcel of the worst, and the comparison to Trump and America (remember, Boris was born in the US and a dual national, until the Americans invited him to remember to pay the taxes US citizens owe).
But there was one small bit of literary criticism he missed, which I find irresistible in the lack of subtlety of its sub-conscious revelation, and not exclusively about Johnson's private life. His alter ego in Seventy-Two Virgins is named Roger Barlow. Roger is British slang, still used (especially by the upper classes) to mean penetrative sex or by extension, so to speak, being dominated to someone else's advantage, as in 'he was well and truly fucked by that'). Roger, then, with the Bar set very Low: does that not describe perfectly both the 'romantic' Johnson as well as the political one?
O'Toole's coup de grace is an analysis of Johnson's dropping in of the Greek word 'akratic' to describe his protagonist. Johnson uses it alongside describing a 'thanatos urge', or death-wish to those of us who didn't study Greek at Eton. But most educated readers would recognise 'thanatos', which makes 'akratic' worth O'Toole's analysis. He explains that 'akrasia', according to Aristotle, is the opposite of control, a weakness of will, incontinence, a person who, O'Toole summarises, 'knows the right thing but cannot help doing the opposite'.
The 'studied careless' of those English upper-classes Johnson (from, as O'Toole notes, a rather bohemian bourgeois background) apes leaves messes for others to clean up. He is of course both 'genuinely clever' and 'quite self-aware', and in the familiar tracing of Johnson's indecision over his stance on Brexit (choosing the one with the clearer, but risky, path to leadership) or his mendaciousness as a Brussels journalist ('he understood a vivid lie is more memorable than the dull truth'). Read the article, because O'Toole is equally sharp tracing of Boris' efforts to re-invent himself as a bumbling, betraying Churchill is part and parcel of the worst, and the comparison to Trump and America (remember, Boris was born in the US and a dual national, until the Americans invited him to remember to pay the taxes US citizens owe).
But there was one small bit of literary criticism he missed, which I find irresistible in the lack of subtlety of its sub-conscious revelation, and not exclusively about Johnson's private life. His alter ego in Seventy-Two Virgins is named Roger Barlow. Roger is British slang, still used (especially by the upper classes) to mean penetrative sex or by extension, so to speak, being dominated to someone else's advantage, as in 'he was well and truly fucked by that'). Roger, then, with the Bar set very Low: does that not describe perfectly both the 'romantic' Johnson as well as the political one?
APOLLO 11, NEIL ARMSTRONG, JOHN STEWART & THE MOON
Since this blog takes its title from a song by John Stewart, the 50th anniversary of the Moon landings might be a good time to recall another Stewart song. I was reminded of this while listening to the penultimate episode of Moon, on BBC Radio 4, a dramatization of the Apollo 11 mission taken from the transcripts of the communication on the spacecraft and with Mission Control in Houston. As the crew prepare for the lunar landing the next day, they are having their dinner, and oddly enough Stewart's song 'Mother Country' plays in the background.
The next day, of course, in the evening our time on America's East Coast, Neil Armstrong would set foot on the moon. The event came during tumultuous times, in the midst of assassination, war, demonstration, and the peak, perhaps, both of American dominance and Sixties revolution against it. But Stewart, who had travelled with Bobby Kennedy working on his campaign, and wrote songs about that, was struck by the accomplishment and the hope, the giant leap for mankind, of the moment. This is his song, 'Armstrong'. And thanks to the same technological push that got us to the moon, you can listen to it on You Tube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvQq3NQN1E8
The next day, of course, in the evening our time on America's East Coast, Neil Armstrong would set foot on the moon. The event came during tumultuous times, in the midst of assassination, war, demonstration, and the peak, perhaps, both of American dominance and Sixties revolution against it. But Stewart, who had travelled with Bobby Kennedy working on his campaign, and wrote songs about that, was struck by the accomplishment and the hope, the giant leap for mankind, of the moment. This is his song, 'Armstrong'. And thanks to the same technological push that got us to the moon, you can listen to it on You Tube.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wvQq3NQN1E8
Saturday, 6 July 2019
THE HEFTY LEFTY: JARED LORENZON
I was saddened to
hear of the death of Jared Lorenzon, 'The Hefty Lefty', former
Kentucky and New York Giants quarterback, aged only 38. His nickname
suited him well: he was oversized for a QB, never in great shape, and
threw with his left-hand. He was a pretty good player, though, and in
a way it's sad his legacy will be built around his weight.
You know players by
their nicknames; legendary players often attract more than one. Ted
Williams was 'The Kid', “The Splendid Splinter” and “Teddy
Ballgame”. George Ruth was 'Babe', “The Bambino” and “The
Sultan Of Swat”. Now these are not always real 'nicknames', in the
sense that they were coined by sportswriters and hung round the necks
of the players: I doubt any of Ted's teammates ever called him
“Splinter”. In fact, 'Joltin' Joe DiMaggio, 'The Yankee Clipper',
was called 'Dago' by his friends. But the most fitting of those names
usually stick. And they are usually, but not always, affectionate.
The Babe was never
called 'Beer Belly Babe', not even in an era of derogatory nicknames
in baseball, which boasted guys like Fatty Fitzsimmons, Leo the Lip,
Tomato Face Cullop, Schnozz Lombardi, Losing Pitcher Mulcahy, Ducky
Wucky Medwick, KiKi Cuyler (he was a stutterer) and Grandma Murphy.
Lorenzon, who was
listed at 6-4 280 pounds with the Giants, didn't mind The Hefty
Lefty. It had a certain ring to it, and wasn't insulting. The
sportswriters came up with The Pillsbury Throwboy, which is clever,
but trying to hard (for my non-American readers, Pillsbury were
America's biggest millers—you can see their huge facility on the
Mississippi when you're in the Twin Cities—and their mascot was a
pugdy character made of dough, a sort of American version of the
Michelin Man, called the Pillsbury Doughboy). The media also tried
The Abominable Throwman, The Round Mound Of Touchdown, Mobile Agile
Hostile & Hungry, and the other one I thought worked, though it's
an inside joke “He Ate Me”.
It was a bit much,
especially since Lorenzon was a pretty good player. I saw him when
Gnat Coombs and I went to Giants pre-season camp for Channel 5 in
2007, before they appeared at Wembley and won Lorenzon a Super Bowl
ring. I had experienced a similar feeling before: when I stayed
around UCF in Orlando after a Claymores/Rhine Fire scrimmage, to
watch their team practice. 'Who's that D lineman throwing the ball?'
I asked. “That's our QB, Daunte Culpepper”. Lorenzon was even
bigger, though not in as good shape. He was a bit like Byron Leftwich
as well. But where Culpepper had a pretty tight delivery, and
Leftwich a very long one, Lorenzon's was anything but consistent.
Partly this was because as he put on weight, he threw less with his
lower body and partly because he was remarkably athletic (he'd been
an excellent high school basketball player, a good baseball player,
and Mr Football in Kentucky his senior year) and wound up throwing on
the run a lot (the fact Kentucky was usually overmatched against D
lines in the SEC didn't help). He spent four years with the Giants,
and Eli Manning credited his help, as a pass rusher in practice, in
developing his escapability, which served him well on the famous
helmet catch by David Tyree.
I liked the fact
that Lorenzon wore number 22 in college and high school; more
quarterbacks should follow in the footsteps of Bobby Layne, John Hadl
and Doug Flutie. He played his first
year at Kentucky for Hal Mumme, who developed the 'air raid' offense,
but I don't think he was a perfect fit for that. Though if you
remember Shane Boyd from NFL Europe, Lorenzon played ahead of him.
After the Super Bowl
year the Giants cut him. He was cut by the Colts in 2008 and saw his
team, the Kentucky Horsemen, in Arena League 2 fold in 2009. He
retired and started coaching at his old high school. But in 2011 he
came out of retirement as the General Manager of the Northern
Kentucky River Monsters of the Ultimate Indoor League. He soon went
back to playing, and was named the league's MVP. He became the first
player I know of to go from MVP of a league to being its
commissioner, but again he left the desk, and in 2013 played for the
Owensboro Rage of the Continental Indoor League until the team ran
out of money and folded before the end of the season. Look at these
leagues and teams this way: If Justified had a football league....
In 2014 he went back
to the River Monsters, who were now also playing in the Continental
League. You have to imagine him, probably pushing 350, in the kind of
tacky gaudy unis those teams wore, scrambling like the Lorenzon of
old as they won they first game, against the Bluegrass Warhorses. His
play became a brief sensation (is there any other kind?) on the
internet. The next week, he was scrambling again, versus the Erie
Explosion, and when he was tackled he broke his leg.
In retrospect, that
was the worst thing that could have happened. Not only was his
football career, such as it was, ended forever, so to was his
mobility and exercise, and his weight ballooned quickly. He did some
local radio, he sold 'Throwboy' Tee-shirts, he made you-tube videos
about his efforts to lose weight, which went over 500 pounds at its
peak. ESPN made a short film about his efforts to lose weight, and he
was down to around 400 at one point.
He died from kidney
and heart problems, exacerbated by an infection, which may have been
down to kidney failure. Obviously his size put great strain on his
body. It's so easy to suggest other scenarios by which he might have
been more successful early, been put under the care of dieticians,
even had a fuller NFL career. Go back and look at his college tape
and think about how he might have played in an environment where he
wasnt under constant pressure, or if Mumme had stayed four years with
him (he had three head coaches in four seasons). Watch some of the
later videos: he's a personable, sincere kid, even into his late 30s,
never acting like someone whose body is being pushed to its core.
But Lorenzon will
always be the Hefty Lefty, and for a short time, that was a hell of a
thing to be.
Tuesday, 2 July 2019
AN ACCEPTABLE LOSS: A Slow Burn Political Thriller
An Acceptable Loss
opens with Elizabeth 'Libby' Lamm arriving for her first day teaching
at a prestigious Chicago university, being met by demonstrators whose
placards talk about death and genocide. Lamm is former security
advisor at the highest levels of the government, and through
flashbacks we see her involved in a major decision about Middle East
policy, arguing with her boss, Rachel Burke, a senior politician, to
whom she is counseling caution. Lamm is now living alone in a large
house, has no computer, no email, no phone. Each night she works by
the light of one lamp, writing in longhand on yellow legal pads.
Although she has been brought in by the head of the department, many
of her colleagues and staff are stand-offish. She is also being
stalked by a student, Martin, who seems increasing obsessed with her.
From this beginning,
writer/director Joe Chappelle has structured a timely political thriller,
whose presentation, a slow drip of flashbacks and minimal exposition,
builds up to some surprising conclusions. It's an intelligently shot
film: with a contrast between the warm colours of the campus, the
empty shadows of Lamm's life, and the darker, harder colder colours
(much of it in washed out balck and white) of her history in power.
But its the structure of the movie that is the challenge, because
information is deliberately withheld, even relatively simple facts,
so that you spend time wondering exactly what position Burke held,
and holds. It is revealed, as is the history of Lamm's involvement
with events that have sparked the protests and reactions, but it does
come slowly. It's also got elements of science fiction film, an
alternate history story, in which little references to events that
remain unexplained take on signficance, and it's interesting to
consider those flashback sections, and their style, in reference to
sf film, which makes a certain amount of sense given Chappelle's background in sf and horror (including the TV series The Fringe--he also directed episodes of The Wire).
Once things start to
be revealed, the pace picks up, and as you might expect the story
turns into a thriller of sorts, with protagonists on the run, the
government closing in on them, and an ending full of twists. It works
exceptionally well: the payoff final 15 minutes put what has come
before into context, and if we have been concentrated too much on
Lamm's seclusion and loneliness, the personal story now makes
chilling sense. The ending contains a couple of surprises, though one
is telegraphed, and the final one is almost a cliché of conspiracy
thrillers. But it leaves you contemplating the slow-build up that
preceded it, and rather than exciting, you realise you have just seen
a thoughtful film.
Of course the movie
is built around Libby, and Tika Sumpter's playing is almost
strong enough to carry it off. She seems to have internalised the
character's withdrawal, and perhaps overplays her underplaying, if
that makes sense, but especially in the scenes with her father
(Clarke Peters) a newspaper editor whose career appears to have been
stymied by her actions, she shines. Ben Tavassoli as her stalker is
full of smouldering intensity, without any moderating control, which
makes an almost comical contrast with his 'sensitive' gay roommate
Jordan (Alex Weisman). There's also a nice little cameo
scene-stealing by David Eigenberg as a drunken professor who calls
out Lamm at a cocktail party.
But the real star is
Jamie Lee Curtis as Burke. And at this point a few small spoilers
will introduce themselves into the review, so stop if that would bother you.
We
don't know Burke's position in the flashbacks—but it turns out to be
Vice President, to a President (Rex Linn) who was a college football
coach, who for example has no idea where Homs is when
they are discussing Syria.
She is obviously the adult in that room. Before we learn she's the
VP, I was measuring how close to Hillary Clinton her performance was,
perhaps she is indeed Secretary of State, but of course the
administration, prima face, is Republican. Nevertheless, I think
Curtis gets a good bit of the Clintonian dichotomy of care and
ruthlessness which made her such a divisive candidate. But the
presence of the good ol' boy president means we could think of Lamm
as a Condoleeza Rice characater, or indeed, in the way her
intelligence is, in the end, used, and the way in which she lets
herself be compromised, also a Colin Powell. It might be a mistake to read too many direct parallels into the story, but even the suggestion is enough to make it resonate with the present day.
In
the movie's real time, Burke is now the President, and the Clinton
paradigm is even more telling, and
here we see her Chief of Staff, Adrian, who was once Lamm's lover and
now has risen with his boss, as a key. He's played with the kind of
menace that defines such characters and Jeff Hephner does a good job
with it. In one of the film's last twists, it mixes character with
conspiracy, personal and political chillingly well.
An
Acceptable Loss, like its title, is ambiguous (its original title,
The Pages, was much less effective) and refers to many losses.
Although many will find the opening sections too slow, or the final
act too short, or not chasey enough, in the end those ambiguities
stay with the viewer long after the film finishes, and to be thinking
about them means it has been successful.
An
Acceptable Loss is available on Digital Download from 15 July
Note:
This review will also appear at Crime Time (www.cimetime.co.uk)