The English
relationship with Raymond Chandler differs from the American. Their
perception of Chandler as the English schoolboy he was gives him a
certain claim to literary cache that is open to few Yanks. At the
same time, it consigns him to the borders of a ghetto from which very
few writers escape. Philip Marlowe is, in these terms, a borderline
figure himself: not quite as 'intellectual' as, say, a Morse (despite
Marlowe's name there's no poetry, no opera in his life, only chess)
and his cases are not cleverly constructed crossword puzzles (see my
essay on the Guardian's Telegraph Crossword Theory of Crime Fiction here). It was nearly 70 years ago Chandler himself debunked such
ideas in a famous essay in the Atlantic Monthly, and now here we are
with a Chandler sequel written by the estimable John Banville, using
his slightly less estimable Benjamin Black persona. And though Banville is, of course, Irish, it is as if
Chandler were still being lifted to the heights of a serious novelist,
but at the same time being held back from them; a very clever way of
having your criminal cake crime and eating it too.
Because of the
first-person narration it is always difficult to separate Marlowe and
Chandler, but Banville is if anything better on the latter. His tone
is very close to Chandler's, his use of metaphor and simile much more
restrained than some of the neo-Marlowes who came along in
Seventies, often wafting in on clouds of purple metaphor. In some
ways, the tone seems closer to Ross MacDonald's than Chandler's, a
little less showy, less self-conscious but more reflective. It flows
well, and it should hook even the most discerning Chandler fan very
quickly.
It's also a very
knowing pastiche, recalling key moments or settings from a number of
Marlowe novels (and films), including the detective taking a Mickey
Finn, and the inevitable scenes at the private club which hides many
secrets. Clare Cavendish, the black-eyed blonde of the title, is a
quintessential Chandlerian femme fatale, and as he delves deeper into
the mystery he's been hired to solve, and the bigger real mystery
that sits behind it, Marlowe finds himself in that classic noirish
dilemma, of wanting to know what you know will be wrong for you, and
overcoming your resistance to self harm.
But this is where
Banville's Marlowe seems a little bit off. It starts with the
situation; this story takes place after Marlowe and Linda Loring
have, what? established a relationship, but Marlowe falls for Clare
like a bozo out of a noir movie. He lacks the intrinsic suspicion and
sometimes profound distrust of women that Chandler's Marlowe has, and seems more in
schoolboy awe of them, as Chandler's English schoolboy might have been.
It's not just that he's closer to the Bogart of the early stages of
The Big Sleep (remember in the novel Marlowe's his repulsion when he discovers Vivian in his bed?) than to Marlowe; he's actually closer to Miles Archer
in Hammett's The Maltese Falcon. At one point he worries, 'before I'd ruined
everything', which sounds more like a high school boy's lament than
a lonely private dick's confession.
A couple of moments
jarred me. One was when Clare mentions a 'Pascalian wager' and
Marlowe asks 'who's Pascal'. Perhaps I missed some irony there,
because I'd assume Marlowe would know of Pascal, and I guess his asking 'who'
suggests he does. Maybe it's a British thing. So is describing a
poured drink as a 'generous measure', something I've only ever heard
Brits (not Irish) use. Yanks tend not to measure their booze, especially in
detective novels.
Banville's finale is
another thing that will probably be more fun to those who know their
Marlowe well. It brings back one of the key Marlowe characters, but
if anything the final scenes are underwritten and anti-climactic;
Terry Lennox is here and gone too quickly, a prop for a nod. The finale's gathering is like one
of those drawing room scenes in a cozy mystery where everything will
be made clear, and comes complete with a little Mousetrap-like (or lite) theatrical humour.
And then there's the famous Chandlerian guy with a gun his hand
walking into the room. I don't wish to add more spoiler than I have,
because I liked the book enough to recommend, and enough to think it
could have been better. In an odd way, he gets the feel of Chandler's
prose better than, say Robert B Parker's Marlowe, but Parker got the
feel for Marlowe's story better. Banville's produced the "better novel", perhaps, but
it doesn't stand with Chandler's best, whether you judge by the
crossword puzzle rules, the literary ones, or indeed Chandler's own. Dulwich College or no.
The Black-Eyed
Blonde by Benjamin Black
Macmillan/Mantle,
£16.99 ISBN 9781447236689
note: this review
will also appear at Crime Time (www.crimetime.co.uk)
1 comment :
This review would be better if banville was British
Post a Comment